Tuesday, May 22, 2018

Our Spiritual World: Our Father...

Our Spiritual World: Our Father...: My son got this for me years ago for father's day. Being as dense as a post, I only just today realized who this cup is referring to...

Monday, May 21, 2018

Dad's love

Our Spiritual World: Dad's love: DAD'S LOVE So, was packing up to go get my sonogram today and just grabbed my loose bills and a 100 Emergency money from wallet. On w...

Our Spiritual World: The Plot to Murder Jeremiah

Our Spiritual World: The Plot to Murder Jeremiah: The Plot to Murder Jeremiah 7 So the priests and the prophets and all the people heard Jeremiah speaking these words in the ho...

Sunday, May 20, 2018

Our Spiritual World: The Cain/Satanic Seed Line

Our Spiritual World: The Cain/Satanic Seed Line: by Pastor Bertrand L. Comparet,A.B., J.D. and Don Bradley It has been brought to my attention many times, that there are preachers and teachers in ...

 Lucifer's children, and I do mean children not just followers, through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until they attached a secondary meaning of serpent to the word nachash. In Genesis 3:1-3 Satan said to Eve, "Is it really true that Yahweh said, You can't eat of any tree in the garden?" As it reads in the Hebrew, Eve replied to Satan, "And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden". Now I am going to switch to the King James translation and I will correct it as I go.

"Of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die." Let's see what it actually said in the Hebrew. Fruit is the Hebrew word pirchach, meaning progeny, brood, children or descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't!

Of the pirchach, of the descendants of the tree, which is in the midst of the garden, Yahweh has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it". That word touch is the Hebrew word naga, which is a more polite expression meaning, to have sexual intercourse with. Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not, it isn't that kind of a tree. In India, the NAGA, means a long ago race of half human, half snake beings. We know them today as nephilim and are frequently caught on video shifting with weird lines forming over their face and exposed arms. These are bloodline nagas, and are often found as TV personalities, politicians, etc. They are promoted over all other satanic shite birds because of the satanic purity to Lucifer.

Yahweh had millions of the pre Adamic, Asiatic and African people around. If He just wanted somebody wide between the shoulders and narrow between the eyes to spade up the garden, He had them. He didn't have to create a special being for that purpose.
Satan had been the governor of this planet until he forfeited the right to this position by rebellion. Yahweh sent Adam here and it is recorded in Luke chapter 3 that Adam was the son of Yahweh. It doesn't record that about any of these preAdamic people mentioned in Genesis chapter 1. Adam was the son of Yahweh and Yahweh sent Adam here to take over by force, kick Satan out and govern this planet. The trees in the Garden of Eden were the family trees of nations and races. Today, the admixture of Adamic and Luciferic bloodlines are everywhere. What returns a person to the purely Adamic, is acceptance of Yeshua the Christ as the true Son of YHVH, Yahua. Then the Holy Spirit descends as a type of spiritual baptism, throwing out the satanic and restoring the Adamic.


Friday, May 18, 2018

Your blog host needs hernia surgery


Turns out, I recently ripped a nice hole 2 inches long "down there." The Docs want abouts $6,000.00 here in LA to fix and repair the tear, which is growing, they say. Laparoscopy. Any help you kind folks can send my way is and always will be, Deeply Appreciated and God Bless You. Don

Paypal Don@uwantson.com

Be a blessing

Apollo Astronaut Cuff Cue Cards, Paul On The Plane

Elon Musk promises $1 rides in LA transit tunnels: BUSTED!

Proof that (satanism) liberalism really is a mental disorder


Wife has affair with another man, soy-boy raises child. wife continues to have affair, no kidding, so she can "express herself and not feel stifled." the modern liberal family. Soyboy agrees, because his programming from early on is complete. Also, wife does not sleep with husband, because in her words, "it would be cheating on her backdoor man."

Gay Antifa freakazoid. Covered in satanic tats. In gay circles adding semen is a common ingredient in the cake mix.

4 billion a year for illegals in Kali, no money for US citizens unless they are minorities. Whites get nothing.

Signs of satans little bitch followers And you never see Trump doing that - he and his wife are devout Christians. But there are the Hildebeast and Butt pirate Obama showing WHO THEY SERVE.

Jihadi killers and abominations. satanism is alive and well in America.

Human sacrifice. Their idea of worship, protected by law now.

Another gay soy-boy, giving the fallen angel allegiance sign.

the woman on her shirt is Marjory Cameron, the concubine of Aleister Crowley and Jack Parsons. She is the matriarchal "hero" of witches everywhere. And one of the nastiest skank sluts ever to walk the earth since Jezebel.

In the new satanic meme, beta cuck males pose with what the homos call the "glory hole pose." Guess what goes in there...

Witches routinely picket and make noise for abortion, a satanic sanctioned ritual murder of a child. Planned parenthood was the brainchild of the CIA and Anton Levey and pushed by Gloria Alred, self-confessed CIA asset, witch, and lesbian activist.

Women of a coven. Hate filled, hideous lesbians who hate the freedoms of America almost as much as they hate Yeshua, our savior.

Young dudes run into all kinds of messed up women nowadays. And its no wonder men are shining on their fascist superiority laden attitudes and bullshite, millennials put out. who wants freak fest weirdism in the home, no normal man.

Our satanic world, sold to us by the CIA controlled MSM and School system

Sigil branding of men by witches, the latest thing. Look familiar? it should, the devils used this sigil in our daily life as the symbol of Bluetooth. Shows how deep and widespread the satanic control of earth truly is.

Hebrews are different from Ashkenazim, eastern euro Jewbies. Like night and day. One follows the Torah, the other, the satanic Talmud and Caballa.

And he thinks he's cool. Of course, the nasty men hating skanks approve...while laughing behind his back. Poor fool.

the new meme...dump the white male, pimp out your daughters to bottom feeders. very few mixed marriages last. I only know of one, in Idaho, but they are special people, blessed. All others I've known about, the male ditched the woman as soon as she wanted responsibility and children. And mostly, these guys have nothing but contempt for these women - its a form of attacking the honky race.

Not just children's fiction

Witches sigil branding..the latest thing, over tats. Tats can be laser removed. but not branding. THAT'S FOREVER.


Thursday, May 17, 2018

Cops fishing social media in hopes of finding law breakers, go after people with a cooking channel for sauteeing mushrooms

Big Brother: Police Raid Home Of Man Who Posted Pictures Of His Mushroom Dinner On Facebook, a legal mushroom you buy in grocery stores.


Authored by Jay Syrmopoulos via TruthInMedia.com,
On May 11, a man named John Garrison posted a public photo on Facebook showing morel mushrooms he had gathered while foraging with his girlfriend Hope Deery, and wrote of his plans to “sautee them with brown sugar and cinnamon and see how that turns out.”

Garrison went on to claim that his original Facebook post about morel mushrooms, which are a legal and sought-after delicacy, led to a visit to his home hours later from law enforcement apparently investigating possible use of psychedelic mushrooms commonly referred to as “magic mushrooms.” Fucktard cop doesn't know the difference from Pscylocybin and food.

Photography is Not a Crime reported that police appeared at his house less than 24 hours later, questioning Garrison and Deery about why they were “eating mushrooms and posting about it online.” Because it's a free country, you fascist cunt.

We had just finished eating the Morels we found today and heard a knock on the door. A police officer and an RA were standing outside. We let them in and as soon as the police officer walked in he asked us why we were eating mushrooms and posting about it online. He thought he was on the biggest bust of his career thinking we were having a magic mushroom party before I explained to him that Morels are a native choice edible mushroom similar to truffles,” Garrison wrote in an additional Facebook post.
The officer allegedly refused to believe that the couple ingested legal mushrooms. that's how stupid he is. Garrison, in an effort to prove that they were simply morel mushrooms, said that he retrieved a piece of the mushroom from the trash— but the officer still refused to believe they hadn’t broken the law until a second officer arrived on the scene and confirmed it was a legal mushroom. Before the officers left, Garrison said his ID was processed.
He wasn’t convinced, the dumbfuck. So I rummaged through the trash to find a piece of a Morel so that he would have evidence that we weren’t taking psychedelic mushrooms. I showed him and he still wasn’t convinced that they weren’t magic mushrooms, Which was shocking to me because morels look nothing like a psychedelic psilocybin mushrooms and I figured a police officer would know what illegal drugs looked like. A second police officer showed up and I showed her the Morel and she immediately knew it was a Morel which was a relief. They processed our ID’s and eventually left. What an experience,” Garrison wrote.
It appears Big Brother is well and truly here... and he's watching you!

Ben Franklin wept. Social engineering...erasing anglo culture


The American Library Association has been overrun by nümales, dykes, and pussyhatters. Stern purse-lipped schoolmarms have been replaced by gloryhole faced dweebs and purple-lipped rug munchers whose only purpose is to corrupt history and erase the contributions of White men to civilization. The vomitorium is now open.



Astronauts High on Science and Low on Intelligence! NASA faking Mars and space travel

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

NHTSA Opens Investigation Into A Tesla Crash in Utah - autopilot caused

Just yesterday we wrote that it was starting to feel like the movie Groundhog Day for Tesla when it comes to the company's executive departures.  Now, there is again a distinct Groundhog Day feel to Tesla - but this time as it relates to U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigations.
Continuing in what has been an unprecedented storm of negative headlines for Elon Musk's company that started a couple months ago, it was announced today that the NHTSA is going to be investigating a recent Tesla crash in Utah. Reuters reported:
The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said on Wednesday that it was sending a team to investigate the crash of a Tesla Inc vehicle last week in Utah that the driver said occurred while the car was in autopilot mode. It is the third Tesla crash that may be linked to the semi-autonomous Autopilot system being investigated by the government agency since January.
“The agency has launched its special crash investigations team to gather information on the South Jordan, Utah, crash,” the agency said on Wednesday. “NHTSA will take appropriate action based on its review.”
That crash, as described previously, involved a Tesla Model S sedan which smashed into a Salt Lake City fire truck while traveling at 60 miles per hour last Friday night. The driver said she was using autopilot at the time of the crash and suffered a broken ankle.
Tesla auto pilot LOVES slamming into parked vehicles on side of road. Loves it. Great software running those rolling crematoriums
The big surprise, as the article points out, is that this is the third investigation that the NHTSA has launched into Tesla since January. This should be of concern for the company as the NHTSA has the authority to force the company into issuing recalls which, if costly enough, could be a financial hurdle that Tesla might have trouble surviving in its current financial state.
NHTSA is also investigating a fatal crash in March that involved a Tesla Model X using Autopilot. It is also probing the January crash of a Tesla vehicle apparently traveling in Autopilot that struck a fire truck. Both incidents were in California.
Last week, NHTSA also said it would probe a May 8 Tesla accident in Florida that killed two teenagers and injured another. Autopilot was not thought to play a part.
NHTSA can order a recall if it finds a defect poses an unreasonable risk to safety.
Certainly the timing of this NHTSA regulatory scrutiny couldn’t be worse for the company, because in addition to its precarious financials, the company main liason to regulators sch as the NTSB and NHTSA departed the company just days ago.
Last Saturday, Tesla competitor Waymo announced that Tesla's Matt Schwall has begun working for the self-driving car unit. According to Schwall's LinkedIn Bio, he had been Tesla's "primary technical contact" with both the NTSB & NHTSA, suggesting the company's troubles with government regulators may be set to escalate.
Regulators aside, analysts have continued to question why the revolving door of executives continues and explore what the potential complications could be as a result. Needless to say, it isn't good news for Tesla.
Also as a reminder, on Sunday morning the WSJ wrote a scathing critique of Tesla's autopilot," In Self-Driving Car Road Test, We Are the Guinea Pigs" in which it questioned the validity of Elon Musk's claims about Tesla's safety record:
Tesla says that its cars with autonomous driving technology are 3.7 times safer than the average American vehicle. It’s true that Teslas are among the safest cars on the road, but it isn’t clear how much of this safety is due to the driving habits of its enthusiast owners (for now, those who can afford Teslas) or other factors, such as build quality or the cars’ crash avoidance technology, rather than Autopilot.
In the wake of a fatal 2016 crash, which happened when Autopilot was engaged, Tesla cited a report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration as evidence that Autopilot mode makes Teslas 40% safer. NHTSA recently clarified the report was based on Tesla’s own unaudited data, and NHTSA didn’t take into account whether Autopilot was engaged. Complicating things further, Tesla rolled out an auto-braking safety feature—which almost certainly reduced crashes—shortly before it launched Autopilot.
As the WSJ also notes, "there isn’t enough data to verify that self-driving vehicles cause fewer accidents than human-driven ones." A Rand Corp. study concluded that traffic fatalities already occur at such relatively low rates—on the order of 1 per 100 million miles traveled—that determining whether self-driving cars are safer than humans could take decades.
For now, we'll wait for the NHTSA's verdict.

Elon Musk, NWO point man for all the lies being sold - climate change, space flight, clean energy - All fictions

Here is the dirtbag giving the hand sign for the nephilim, fallen angels. It's why billions are being poured into his fake company that makes expensive cars that have NO RANGE, and spontaneously combust.

Monday, May 14, 2018

Alveda King Crushes Maxine Waters: ‘You Are Playing The Race Card Again’

Alveda King, niece of Martin Luther King Jr., attacked Democratic California Rep. Maxine Waters’ narrative on America’s racial divide Monday on Fox Business.
WATCH:
Waters got into a heated debate last week with Republican Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Kelly on the House floor, during which Waters brought up her racial background.
“Congressman Waters is on the wrong frequency,” King said about the heated debate between Kelly and Waters. “The skin color thing, trying to equate a person’s skin color to their race,” Alveda said, adding that Rep. Kelly is actually “right when he’s saying the nation needs help, the nation is in trouble.”
King said Waters was “playing the race card again,” and that the only way Americans can “learn to live together as brothers, and I’ll add as sisters” is to “get past that skin color argument.”
“Our blood is red,” King said, “of one blood God made all people to live together on the face of the Earth.”
King continued, saying that Waters knows “we are all one race,” but continues “to play the race card again.” The niece of MLK also noted that “the job market is up, unemployment is down” and “Americans are getting opportunities to go back to work.”

Tesla Bursts Into Flames In Switzerland, Killing Driver Trapped Inside

When it rains, it pours, or in the case of Tesla, it bursts in flames.

In the same week in which a Tesla Model S erupted in flames causing a "horrific" crash in Ft. Lauderdale, fatally trapping the two teenagers who died inside, while a second Model S rammed a stopped Salt Lake City firetruck at 60mph, mercifully without any fatalities, the Swiss tio.ch reports that yet another Tesla burst into flames causing a crash on the A2 highway near the town of Bellinzona, killing a 48-year-old German driver who was trapped inside.

According to the Swiss publication, the driver, a 48-year-old German motorist from Baden-Wurtermberg, lost control of the vehicle a few meters after the Monte Ceneri tunnel, crashing into the central guardrail, an accident that was remarkably similar to an October 2017 crash in Austria, in which a Model S also burned down, however without any fatalities.
The car caught fire then overturned and, fatally trapping the driver.

According to the Facebook page of the Bellinzona fire department, the flames were once again started by the lithium-ion batteries after the crash. The Fire department explains that "the violent explosion of Lithium Ion Batteries caused a phenomenon called "thermal runaway", i.e, a rapid and unstoppable increase in temperature."

The car had its autopilot engaged at the moment of the crash, although now that both the NTSB and NHTSA are looking to last week's tragic Tesla crash which killed two young men under similar circumstances, we are confident the answer will be available soon.

And yet, Matt Schwall, won't be there the reveal it: as we reported yesterday, Schwall, the Tesla exec who until last week had been Tesla's "primary technical contact" with both the NTSB & NHTSA, resigned quietly and moved to Tesla's competitor Waymo. Commenting on this departure, we wondered if it suggests that the "company's troubles with government regulators may be set to escalate."

Judging by the trio of fiery battery explosions in just one week, we are willing to go on a limb here and answer "yes."

source zerohedge

Friday, May 11, 2018

In The Face Of The Government's Land Grabs

Authored by John Whitehead via The Rutherford Institute,

We have no real property rights.

Think about it. 


That house you live in, the car you drive, the small (or not so small) acreage of land that has been passed down through your family or that you scrimped and saved to acquire, whatever money you manage to keep in your bank account after the government and its cronies have taken their first and second and third cut...none of it is safe from the government’s greedy grasp.

At no point do you ever have any real ownership in anything other than the clothes on your back.
Everything else can be seized by the government under one pretext or another (civil asset forfeiture, unpaid taxes, eminent domain, public interest, etc.).

The American Dream has been reduced to a lease arrangement in which we are granted the privilege of endlessly paying out the nose for assets that are only ours so long as it suits the government’s purposes.

And when it doesn’t suit the government’s purposes? Watch out.

This is not a government that respects the rights of its citizenry or the law. Rather, this is a government that sells its citizens to the highest bidder and speaks to them in a language of force.
Under such a fascist regime, the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which declares that no person shall “be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation,” has become yet another broken shield, incapable of rendering any protection against corporate greed while allowing the government to justify all manner of “takings” in the name of the public good.
Practically anything goes now.
Relying on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2005 ruling in Kelo v. City of New Londonentire neighborhoods have been seized and bulldozed to make way for shopping malls, sports complexes and corporate offices.
Indeed, little has prevented the government from bulldozing its way through the Fifth Amendment in an effort to take from the middle and lower classes and fatten the coffers of the corporate elite.
For instance, consider the government’s pipeline projects.
All across the country, power companies have been given the green light to build massive gas and oil pipelines that crisscross the country, cutting through private and public lands, as well as unspoiled wilderness.
“Yet despite oft-repeated claims by politicians and oil executives about the danger of relying on foreign oil, this U.S. petroleum renaissance never was designed to make America energy self-sufficient,” points out journalist Sandy Tolan. “A growing amount of that oil will end up in China, Japan, the Netherlands, even Venezuela.”
So much for the public use, huh?
These pipeline projects which are getting underway in a dozen states have stirred up a hornet’s nest of protests. Not all of the protests that have arisen in response to these pipeline projects hinge on environmental concerns.
Some of the protesters are landowners, simple farmers and homeowners who merely want the government and its corporate partners-in-crime to keep their grubby paws off their personal property.
In Virginia, for instance, activists have taken to tree sitting—living for weeks on end in platforms suspended above the ground in trees—as a form of protest over the devastation that is being wrought by these pipelines.
These acts of civil disobedience come at a costly price.
Pipeline and forestry officials have been working hard to make life as difficult as possible for the protesters, allegedly blocking their access to food and water and medical supplies, shining floodlights into the trees at all hours of the night, creating ground disturbances to dislodge their nests, and urging the courts to levy heavy fines for each day that the work to clear the forests for the pipeline is delayed.
Here’s what one resident of Roanoke, Va., wrote to me about the manner in which the Mountain Valley Pipeline is being inflicted on his community:
Our small community has been invaded by private security and a fully militarized local police department. Mountain Valley Pipeline has begun cutting trees and has brought in private military contractors similar to what was used in North Dakota. They are basically using the power of government to steal this land for private profit. The residents and land owners of Bent Mountain now find themselves subject to arrest for walking in their own driveway, taking pictures of the pipeline companies ever-changing survey lines and path of destruction, or in more than one case, for confronting MASKED ARMED MEN ON THEIR PROPERTY IN THE DEAD OF NIGHT. One of my neighbors was accosted on his own back porch by police for photographing the MVP surveyors continually moving the corridor of their easement. I have even had armed private security trespassing on my property miles away in neighboring Floyd County.
It takes a lot of gall to trespass onto someone’s private property, tear up their land, cut down their trees, pollute their air and water, prevent them from moving freely on their own property, threaten them with fines and arrests for challenging the intrusion, and then force them to pay (by way of taxes) to retain ownership of the property or sell it cheaply or at a loss so it can be torn down and used for some purpose that the government deems more beneficial to its bottom line.

That’s how little respect the government has for our rights.

Unfortunately, American taxpayers have become trespassers on their own property thanks to the government’s ongoing land grabs and utter disregard for property rights.
More than 200 years after early Americans went to war over their right to life, liberty and property, “we the people” have been reduced to little more than serfs in bondage, indentured servants, and sharecroppers. And the lines between private and public property have been so blurred that private property is reduced to little more than something the government can use to control, manipulate and harass you to suit its own purposes, and you the homeowner and citizen have been reduced to little more than a tenant in bondage to an inflexible landlord.
So where does that leave us?
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the battle to protect our private property has become the final constitutional frontier, the last holdout against our freedoms being usurped.
After all, the American dream is about gaining sovereignty over one’s life and property. Without this sovereignty - this unshakeable guarantee of ownership and dominion, even over one’s own life - there can be no true liberty or freedom. 



2017 Statistics Just Came Out... And The "War On Cops" Is Officially A Myth

Authored Carey Wedler via TheAntiMedia.com,
Though right-wing commentators continue to decry the ‘war on cops,’ the latest data released by the country’s top law enforcement undermines that alarmist narrative.

According to the FBI’s annual Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted report, released this week, there were fewer police deaths in 2017 than in 2016. In 2016, 118 law enforcement officers died in the line of duty while in 2017, that number was 93.

More telling is the type of death the officers suffered. Last year, 46 officers were killed “feloniously” on the job while 47 died in accidents. As the FBI’s press release noted, “Both numbers have decreased from 2016, during which 66 officers were feloniously killed and 52 were accidentally killed, for a total of 118 line-of-duty deaths.”

The data is collected from “local, state, tribal, campus, and federal law enforcement agencies from around the country, as well as organizations that track officer deaths.”
A closer look at the statistics reveals further just how nonexistent the war on cops actually is. Of the 46 officers feloniously killed on the job, five were ambushed (defined as “entrapment/premeditation” by the FBI) and 3 were victims of unprovoked attacks. Twenty-one died during “investigative or enforcement activities,” which include traffic stops, investigating suspicious persons, or tactical situations.

In other words, they were killed doing the jobs they signed up to do (consider the popular refrain that ‘cops risk their lives’ — that’s part of the job description), though police officer does not even crack the top ten most dangerous jobs in the United States.

The takeaway here is that while some officers die on the job - and that is unfortunate - the deliberate sentiment to kill officers simply because they are police officers is not on the rise.

Thirty-five officers died in car accidents — more than four times the number killed by ambushes and unprovoked attacks (eight) — and according to the FBI, “of the 29 officers killed in automobile accidents, 12 were wearing seatbelts, and 15 were not,” though two of the officers not wearing seatbelts were sitting in parked cars.  Regardless, more officers died in car accidents while not wearing seatbelts (a violation of the laws they enforce, as it happens) than died as a result of flagrant attacks on their lives isolated from situational circumstances.

Further, the total number of officers killed by accident far dwarfs the number killed in ambushes or unprovoked attacks, and the total is still greater than all law enforcement deaths recorded in the annual report.

Further still, the number of cops killed feloniously was higher in 2016, 2014, 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2009 than it was last year, suggesting the rate of cop murders is subject to fluctuation and not consistently on the rise.

In another relevant detail, zero federal law enforcement agents were killed in 2017. In 2016, one was killed.

Despite the ongoing claims that police are under assault (as they continue to assault the public) — and despite congressional action to designate killing police officers a hate crime — for yet another year, this war on cops notion is proving to be nothing more than a myth.


We already know that on-the-job deaths of cops, regardless of cause, is dwarfed by occupations such as farmers and roofers.  The probability of a cop dying on the job is less that 50% that of many "laborers".

The distraction is from the civilian population that is wantonly killed by cops - killers that are licensed by local governments.  Cops are a unionized force of thugs that are protected by unfair binding arbitration agreements.  The police do not "protect and serve"; they are loyal only to their union.  If you do not know that, examine any situation that involves an individual cop versus the local government that hired him.  In a cop-civilian situation cops institute lethal force from the get-go without any regard to determining whether an individual represents a lethal threat.  Whereas a law abiding firearms carrying citizen cannot draw and fire his weapon short of his life being physically terminated, a cop can say, "I feared for my life" (regardless of what the threat constituted) and kill whomever putatively caused the "fear".

Cops "lawyer up" immediately and are not required to file statements that describe a cop-civilian conflict whereas civilians in a similar conflict are jailed, have their constitutional rights denied and are coerced to provide self incriminating information - without right to counsel.

 Cops don't care if you are an R or D when they are kicking in your head or seizing some cash that you may have in your car

 Being held at gunpoint is pretty typical believe it or not. Happened twice to me. Riding bike home down sidewalk from work. Cop stops me, cars spotlight right on my face. has me put hands in the air at gunpoint. Doesn't ask my name, just proceeds to put his hands in all my pockets then tells me I look like someone they're looking for, and that I can go. All he wanted to do was scare me and check if I had anything illegal. I bet he was begging for me to drop my hands or flinch so he could justify shooting me. Bullies.


I was coming home the other day, and a cop turned onto the road in front of me.  He was ending his day of enforcing victimless crimes.  He leaves his hiding spot at 4pm.
He generally drives home doing about 50 in 30 zone.

Wednesday, May 9, 2018

the memoirs of billy shears Beatle Paul confession of being a double

Paul to Faul - Handed on a plate in plain sight but you still cant see it

Tesla Model S bursts into flames during test drive event in France - Tom...

Shooting 8000mah Lipo Battery with Nail Gun A TESLA BATTERY

Tesla Model S Bursts Into Flames After "Horrific" Crash, Killing Two Men Trapped Inside

Less than two months after a Tesla Model X burst into flames in Mountain View, CA after a gruesome crash attributed to an autopilot error trapped the driver in the burning car resulting in his death, Tesla tragedy has struck again after two 18-year-old men died, trapped in a fiery Model S crash near Fort Lauderdale beach Tuesday evening, the SunSentinel reported.
model S- The 700hp rolling instant crematory
As WPLG reports, in the "horrific crash" of the Tesla Model S with three young people hit a wall and then caught on fire, while a third teen was ejected from the car.
According to Battalion Chief Greg May, of Fort Lauderdale Fire Rescue, the Tesla Model S burst into flames after it wrecked about 7:30 p.m. and the two men who died were trapped inside.
A third man, also 18, who was in the backseat of the Tesla Model S, was thrown from the car when it crashed in the 1300 block of Seabreeze Boulevard, said Tracy Figone, a spokeswoman for the Fort Lauderdale Police Department. He was hospitalized. His condition was not known.
So far the identities of the three men were not released.
Neighborhood resident Wendy Mascolo told WFOR-Ch. 4 that she heard the violent crash when it happened and ran to help.
“These parents, they got the worst call of their lives and their lives are never going to be the same,” she told the station.
The investigation is ongoing.

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Friday, May 4, 2018

Canadian Arrested For Denying Official Holocaust Story (Part 1)

More Than 4 Million Americans Have Lost Health Insurance Since 2016

Because they can no longer afford the massive increases in monthly payments, that when truly needed, cover very little with stiff deductibles that wipe out a family's savings.

Dental insurance is even worse, covering nothing but mercury amalgams which poison the brain and body, and check ups. The rest is on you. I know this because, two sons had to see a dentist and between the two of them, it will cost $14, 000.00 for what 20 years ago would have been under a $1,000.00 total. 

Up until the 1990s, in America, medical insurance was provided FREE OF CHARGE BY ALL EMPLOYERS. Then the jobs left the USA, to China, and so did our benefits.

And since that time, insurance premiums have become on par with house payments, on a monthly basis. This is why millions have given up insurance.


  • Too expensive
  • It no longer provides meaningful coverage

Ojai has become freak land, every weekend now...complete with cruising pedophiles roaming the arcade and Libbey Park

From the internet

Ron Paul's former campaign manager died from complications caused by pneumonia because he couldn't afford health insurance, it has emerged. The details surrounding the 2008 death of Kent Snyder were revealed by Gawker after the Tea Party candidate indicated he did not agree with free state health care for the poor.

Mr Snyder, 49, died on June 26, 2008, with hospital costs totalling $400,000 after he became ill with viral pneumonia. The bill for his care was sent to his mother, who was unable to pay, and so a website was set up by friends to secure donations. Mr Paul's election campaign did not provide workers with medical insurance.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2037330/Ron-Pauls-campaign-mana
10 Years Later...$800,000...

----------

Obamacare? It's dogshit

It quickly wasn't free tho.... a year later it was two hundred, a year after that it was four hundred, another year and it's eight...I had to drop it when it jumped to sixteen.

Thank God Trump killed the mandate or they'd be fining me. McStain and his thumbs down is gonna cost us all trillions before it's over.

The insurance companies are the problem.
 ---------
 Before Obama care I had a blue cross blue shield family plan that worked and that I paid for out of my own earnings without any government assistance.   The democrats then said because my plan would not pay for gender reassignment surgery it was illegal. The democrats offered me a new plan under Obamacare that was three times the cost of my original plan. 

It also came with a massive deductible meaning I would most likely never ever use any of the benefits of their plan. it would be over 25K in bills before they would pay anything.  It was three times my house payment for this plan!  I had three kids and a wife, we did not want nor qualified for the welfare tax assistant program that so many Americans received to pay for this high priced policy.
-----------


My insurance plan has been CANCELLED 4 times since O'Bozo Care started implementation.  Each time was because of additional stupidity that was added to the regulations. (I have private pay, I'm not covered under an employer plan) Many have experienced the same but the progs go on TV and lie that "Nobody has lost their insurance under O'Bozo Care".  Sorry asswipe, I have the DOCUMENTATION proving otherwise.

Every time I have had to change plans the premiums raise dramatically, the coverage is much worse, and the deductibles and copays become more draconian. My premiums are 3X what they were 4 years ago and the coverage is much worse.
-----------
 

Thursday, May 3, 2018

Musk's conduct Tesla stock slide make $700 million profit for short-sellers


NEW YORK (Reuters) - Short-sellers who had targeted Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) logged a $700 million paper profit on Thursday after the stock fell nearly 9 percent a day after Chief Executive Elon Musk stunned analysts by dodging “boring” questions about the electric car maker’s financial outlook.
 
The windfall wiped out short-sellers’ 2018 losses on Tesla, the biggest U.S. equity short, bringing year-to-date paper profits to $683 million, said Ihor Dusaniwsky, head of research at financial analytics firm S3 Partners.

Short-sellers aim to profit by selling borrowed shares with the hope of buying them back later at a lower price.

Tesla’s shares and bonds slid on Thursday as investors took Musk to task for cutting off analysts’ questions and grappled with concerns over Tesla’s ability to raise money in the future.
In a bizarre conference call, the iconoclastic CEO described questions about Tesla’s capital requirements as “boring” after Tesla, which also makes solar technology, reported a record loss of $709.6 million, or $4.19 per share, in the first quarter ended March 31.

“Don’t let Musk’s conference call theatrics fool you. He did not want investors to focus on his rapidly deteriorating finances,” prominent short-seller Jim Chanos of Kynikos Associates LP told Reuters in an email.

“Tesla’s quick ratio dropped to 0.38 and their (Altman) z-score is approaching 1.0,” Chanos said.
The so-called quick ratio is a commonly used indicator of short-term liquidity, while an Altman z-score is a combination of weighted business ratios that is used to estimate the likelihood of financial distress.

“Both are indicative of a company in financial distress,” said Chanos.
Chanos told Reuters in November he continued to add to his short position in Tesla throughout 2017.

EXPENSIVE SHORT

The borrowing cost for Tesla is around 3.69 percent, up from about 1 percent at the start of the year, putting it among the top 5 percent most-expensive stocks on the Russell 3000 index to short, according to S3 Partners.

Shorts have to shell out $1.22 million every day to keep their position on, the most for any stock in the Russell 3000 Index, according to S3 Partners data.

Selling Tesla short has not always paid off. Shorts logged $2.3 billion in mark-to-market losses in 2017, as the shares soared 45.7 percent for the year.

But the stock has lost 9 percent in 2018 so far as investors fretted about issues such as a federal probe of a fatal crash on March 23 in California involving one of its vehicles and a downgrade of its credit position by Moody’s Investors Service.

Emboldened by production setbacks at the company, short sellers have boosted short interest in the stock by $2.5 billion, or 26 percent, for the year.

That took the overall short interest to $11.94 billion, enlarging what had been, off and on since March 2016, the largest equity bear bet in U.S. markets, according to S3 Partners data.
Options traders also boosted their bearish bets against Tesla in recent weeks.
Tesla Inc284.75
TSLA.ONasdaq
-16.40(-5.45%)
TSLA.O
  • TSLA.O
Investor Christopher Irons, founder of independent investigative research website quoththeravenresearch.com, said he had a small position in deep out-of-the money puts on Tesla, that makes money if the stock crashes.
Musk’s remarks during the analyst call shook investors’ confidence in Tesla, Irons said.
“Being a public company is a privilege and if you are going to take the good of being a public company, you owe it to the public to answer their questions,” said Irons.
Reporting by Saqib Iqbal Ahmed and Jennifer Ablan; Editing by Alden Bentley and Bernadette Baum

Feminists preach a propaganda that more women in power will make the world more peaceful. It's taught in schools now, by the feminist faculty

European Queens Waged More Wars Than Kings

By
Sending the peasants into the slaughter, twice as much as men.
There’s an assumption about women in power that you may have heard: that women who lead tend to be more diplomatic than their male counterparts, resulting in a more peaceful world. Psychologist Steven Pinker, for instance, wrote in his 2011 book, The Better Angels of Our Nature, “Over the long sweep of history, women have been and will be a pacifying force.” A oft spread and total lie regarding history and even office politics.
After sifting through historical data on queenly reigns across six centuries, two political scientists have found that it’s more complicated than that. In a recent working paper, New York University scholars Oeindrila Dube and S.P. Harish analyzed 28 European queenly reigns from 1480 to 1913 and found a 27 percent increase in wars when a queen was in power, as compared to the reign of a king. “People have this preconceived idea that states that are led by women engage in less conflict,” Dube told Pacific Standard, but her analysis of the data on European queens suggests another story.
Interestingly, Dube and Harish think the reason why queens were able to take part in more military policy can be explained by the division of labor that tended to happen when a queen — particularly a married queen — ruled. Queens managed foreign policy and war policies, which were often important to bring in cash, while their husbands managed the state (think taxes, crime, judicial issues, etc.). As the authors theorize, “greater division of labor under queenly reigns could have enabled queens to pursue more aggressive war policies.” Kings, on the other hand, didn’t tend to engage in division of labor like ruling queens — or, more specifically, they may have shared military and state duties with some close adviser, but not with the queen. And, Dube and Harish argue, it may be this “asymmetry in how queens relied on male spouses and kings relied on female spouses [that] strengthened the relative capacity of queenly reigns, facilitating their greater participation in warfare.”
Here’s Dube and Harish with more on that:
Female reigns may have had higher capacity to carry out war since queens often put their spouses in charge of official state matters. This division of labor would then have freed up time and resources for queens to pursue more aggressive war policies. In contrast, kings typically were less inclined to put their spouses in official positions through which they could aid in managing the polity.
This asymmetry in spousal division of labor emerged in several realms. Since women didn’t serve as heads of militaries, queens would often appoint their husbands to this role, though kings of course, did not do the same with their wives.. As an example, when Queen Dona Maria II of Portugal married Prince Augustus Francis Anthony in 1836, their marriage contract stated that he would serve as commander in chief of the army.
And when husbands of queens managed state affairs, the success of the country was strong. The authors point to Francis Stephen, who revamped the Austrian economic system while his wife, Queen Maria Theresa, used that cash to bolster the army. “Spousal support,” in other words, was a win-win for these royal couples, allowing queens to not only be more invested but also more successful than their peers who acted alone. (Modern couples, take note.) That doesn’t mean that queens and kings always agreed — qualitative data suggests that, in fact, queens and kings often disagreed, and virulently, with most queens RARELY marching onto the battlefield. 

The queens’ marital status made a difference here; as the authors write, “among married monarchs, queens were more likely to participate as attackers than kings.” If a queen were single — which was the case with 13 of those they studied — she was more likely to be attacked compared to the times when a king was in power, perhaps because her country was seen in the outside world as being more vulnerable and thus easier to attack.
But the authors emphasize that the increase in wars on a queen’s watch is likely explained by an attempt by the female leaders to signal their strength. Were that true, you’d expect a spike in war participation earlier in the queens’ careers, and that wasn’t the case according to the data analyzed here. Dube and Harish also argue that the queens were actively seeking to fight more wars. But here are a few more relevant commonalities of queenly reigns: Queens didn’t tend to use war ministers as much as kings, they relegated other tasks to their husbands, and they often threw themselves into the policy-making machine wholeheartedly.
It’s just a working paper, which means that Dube and Harish may uncover more as they continue to research this subject. But so far their findings have already begun to poke a few holes in some commonly distributed lies.